“We are all press here.”
That was the reminder BlogHer organizers gave to all assembled for the opening session of BlogHer 2007 today at Chicago’s Navy Pier.
Everything related to the media is changing, especially traditional concepts of who’s a reporter and who’s the public. In a crowd of bloggers, it pays to remember we are all the media.
Cartoonist Tom Tomorrow’s take on How the News Works is a little too close to the truth for comfort.
Today is Patrick Stewart’s 67th birthday.
I’m a long-time fan, and I still rue the day the Star Trek TV franchise ended. I don’t go to Star Trek conventions or dress up like a Klingon at Halloween or anything — I’m not that kind of a fan — but sometimes I just wanna watch an episode of Star Trek. Fortunately for me, Spike TV, the “macho guy” channel, offers afternoon reruns of Star Trek: The Next Generation.
What’s the appeal? Can’t be that bald dome…though my Dad was bald…hmm. Maybe it’s the British accent and the fact that we both enjoy a nice cuppa Earl Grey (or at least his character, Captain Jean Luc Picard, did).
A couple years ago in Las Vegas, I ran into Patrick Stewart. He was gracious enough to let me get this souvenir shot. If he appears a little stiff, there’s a reason: we were at Madame Tussauds.
John McCain says we can’t leave Iraq now. Referring to Vietnam, he says he’s “seen this movie before.”
So have we. Maybe he forgot the ending?
Of course, this is the same guy who, after losing some key campaign staffers because he’s out of money, says, “I’d describe the campaign as going well…I think we’re doing fine.”
Yeah, right.
Reminds me of a couple other big-name politicians who are in denial. First, there’s Joe Leiberman, who’s still running around saying we’re winning in Iraq (what’s he been smoking?).
Then, of course, there’s the irrepressible George W., who’s now taking a “Peter Pan” approach to the war…if he just “believes” hard enough (and gets the rest of us to say we believe too), his “Tinkerbell” war will come back to life…and he’ll be remembered as a war hero, not as “the goat.”
Fat chance. Baah!
Wanna read more?
SF Chron: Bush fights growing chorus for exit
NYT: McCain campaign drops top aides; new doubts rise
It was 22 names this time, the most ever. This morning our minister read 22 names. That’s how many American soldiers died in Iraq and Afghanistan in the past week.
Each Sunday we hear the names and acknowledge the loss. They are men and women unknown to me who have died fighting on behalf of my country, in a mismanaged war based on lies. Seven were from California. Some were old enough to leave behind families…wives, children, maybe even grandchildren. Some were so young they probably never had a chance to find love and marry.
This week’s dead are:
And since those 22 names were read this morning, the Department of Defense has announced six more American deaths (five men, one woman) on its news release web page:
According to reports on tonight’s news, the U.S. death toll now tops 3,000. And, of course, that’s not counting contractors…or the estimated 160,000+ Iraqi civilians who have died since we invaded Iraq.
But there is a glimmer of hope…another Republican senator, Pete V. Domenici of New Mexico, has come to grips with reality and broken ranks with the president on Iraq, calling for a pullout of U.S. troops from Iraq. And in one of this Sunday’s editorials, The Road Home, the NYT editorial board finally stated the obvious:
It is time for the United States to leave Iraq, without any more delay than the Pentagon needs to organize an orderly exit.
How do you define beauty? How have our ideas of what is beautiful changed over time? Over generations? Over the centuries? The video “Women in Art” explores that question, showing 500 years of portraits of women by Western artists…one image morphing into another, one era into another, a changing portrait of beauty.
If you’d like to see more YouTube videos by “eggman,” here’s the link: http://www.youtube.com/user/eggman913
P.S. Thanks to Steve Greene for passing on the link to this video.
Let me see if I’ve got this straight…the Bush administration’s NSA secret wiretapping program is so secret that nobody can find out whether or not they’ve been secretly spied on, or prove whether or not they’ve been injured by being secretly spied on. That’s the reason two of the three appeals court judges gave for dismissing the case, saying none of the plaintiffs has grounds to sue.
Sounds like circular logic to me.
I just sent this letter (without the graphics) to both of my senators:
Yesterday I went to see Michael Moore’s film, Sicko. I left the theater wondering why — if America is the smartest, richest, most innovative and powerful nation in the world — we can’t figure out how to provide good health care to all Americans.
If the Canadians, the British and the French can do it (to say nothing of the Cubans), why can’t we?
For example, did you know that in Great Britain, doctors get bonuses based on the improved health of people in their care? If their patients stop smoking, lower their blood pressure, etc., they get a bonus. In the United States, doctors get bonuses for seeing the most patients per day, for not making referrals, and for denying requests for treatment. Our insurance companies reward doctors and other employees for denying coverage and courses of treatment — for limiting costs, not for helping people. We’ve got it entirely backwards.
It is clear that our national priority has been to make health care profitable for PPOs, HMOs, insurance companies and pharmaceutical companies, not to care for people. This has to change. We need to put people first, not corporate profits. We need to make health care a national right, not a profit center.
I think it’s time to refocus the health care debate…away from incremental and useless changes like requiring people to buy insurance (so are they supposed to stop eating to pay for coverage?), or funding some coverage for poor children (at least until those funds run out — tonight I watched NOW’s Insuring the Children on PBS; it talked about how the State Children’s Health Insurance Program is running out of funds and what that means to children can’t get covered…like the Georgia girl who is likely to die without her diabetes meds).
Frankly, health insurance is not the answer. It is no guarantee of health care, not when insurance companies focus on making profits by denying claims and coverage.
One of my friends, a woman in her 50s who recently changed careers, is deeply worried about losing her job. Loss of income is bad enough, but the thing that really keeps her awake at night is the fear of losing her health insurance. She’s got a health problem and she’s worried that it will become a “pre-existing condition” and she’ll won’t be able to afford to get treated. And if she can’t get treated, she won’t be able to work.
In other developed countries, people can focus on doing their jobs, living their lives and caring for their families. They don’t have to worry about being bankrupted by an illness or injury. They don’t have to worry about dying because some bureaucrat denied them coverage or a needed treatment.
I want what other developed countries have. I want the security of knowing that if I get sick or am injured, it won’t bankrupt my family. I want to know that if I get a serious injury or illness, I won’t be allowed to die so some insurance executive can get a bonus. I want to know that, should I be unfortunate enough to end up with Alzheimer’s like my mother, my family won’t go have to through hell and destitute themselves trying to care for me.
National polls now show that health care is a top concern of a majority of Americans. That’s because even those of us who have insurance know we are just one job and one claim away from denial of treatment or loss of coverage.
Please, it’s time to change the debate on health care. It’s time to make health care a basic right, not another privatized profit-making venture. Please do something.
If you want to do something, you can start by writing your representatives a letter too. Feel free to recycle parts of mine, if you like. And go see Sicko. See through the propaganda we’ve been fed all our lives, and see how the other half of the developed world lives.
My garden…blooming in red, white and blue.
Happy July 4th!
I almost skipped it.
I was skimming the Books Update email from the NYT Sunday Book Review when I noticed a review of The Edge of Evolution by Michael J. Behe. His name sounded familiar, but I couldn’t quite place it.
The promo blurb said, “In his second book, Michael Behe turns to genetics to poke holes in Darwin’s theory.” That’s when I noticed the reviewer: evolutionary biologist Richard Dawkins.
Oh my, I thought, this is gonna be good.
It was. It’s one of the kindest but most totally decimating reviews I’ve ever read. You can read it here.
____________________
One thing I hadn’t realized is that Dawkins is the guy who coined the term “meme” to describe (as noted in his Wikipedia entry) “how Darwinian principles might be extended to explain the spread of ideas and cultural phenomena.”
One of the most thought-provoking books I’ve ever read is Thought Contagion, a book about memes and the transmission of ideas by Aaron Lynch. I read it at about the same time I read another influential book, The Tipping Point by Malcolm Gladwell.
Both Lynch and Gladwell consider how ideas, beliefs and even new products or fads are spread through society. That is, they try to explain why some ideas, beliefs or products catch on and become popular, while others — that seem equally viable — simply don’t.
In Thought Contagion, Lynch identifies several “propagation advantages,” which is how he describes the characteristics that tend to encourage people to pass on or “propagate” a specific idea or belief. In The Tipping Point, Gladwell looks at the factors that make ideas or products “sticky” and more likely to catch on with the public.
Both of these books could be helpful to folks in the advertising, marketing and P.R. professions — to anyone who’s in the business of persuading others, for that matter — as well as to journalists and others who need to better understand the factors that shape society and debates on public issues.
